News and knowhow for farmers

The NEWS platform for farming families feeding Africa

How to properly handle manure for optimum crop yield

Share on social media

saerd centre farm organic manure

Des­pite its dis­cov­ery by farm­ers all over the world since an­cient days in its con­nec­tion with in­creased crop pro­duc­tion, farm­ers in Africa es­pe­cially Sub-Saha­ran Africa (SSA) do not apply re­com­men­ded ma­nure man­age­ment prac­tices in their farm­ing lead­ing to poor yields.

Ac­cord­ing to May this year re­search in 13 SSA coun­tries by a team of ex­perts on Ma­nure Man­age­ment Prac­tices and Policies in Sub-Saha­ran Africa: Im­plic­a­tions on Ma­nure Qual­ity as a Fer­til­izer, ef­fect­ive use of live­stock ma­nure as a fer­til­izer de­pends crit­ic­ally on meth­ods of ma­nure hand­ling and stor­age which most small­holder farm­ers in the con­tin­ent may not be aware of.

In Kenya, for in­stance, the gov­ern­ment the gov­ern­ment this year pro­posed a new bill through the Food Crops Reg­u­la­tions 2018 which if passed was to make it il­legal for farm­ers to use an­imal ma­nure in food pro­duc­tion.

The reg­u­la­tion 30 (1) and (2) of the bill which was draf­ted by the Cab­inet Sec­ret­ary Ag­ri­cul­ture, county gov­ern­ments and the Ag­ri­cul­ture and Food Au­thor­ity states that a grower shall not use raw an­imal ma­nure for the pro­duc­tion of food crops. In­stead, grow­ers shall only use chem­ical fer­til­izers at rates re­com­men­ded by the re­spect­ive County Gov­ern­ment.

“This was in­formed by the fact that most of our farm­ers are not ad­her­ing to good ag­ri­cul­tural prac­tices es­pe­cially in hand­ling the ma­nure hence af­fect­ing our ex­port mar­ket as the fresh pro­duce may fail health test by the Glob­al­GAP,” said Ant­ony J.N. Nyaga, KALRO – PTC.

Due to pub­lic health con­cerns, the Glob­al­GAP for­bids the ap­plic­a­tion of un­treated ma­nure on leafy ve­get­ables once they are planted and re­stricts ma­nure ap­plic­a­tion to 60 days be­fore har­vest­ing for other crops.

In ad­di­tion, poorly dis­charged ma­nure can lead to con­tam­in­a­tion and eu­troph­ic­a­tion of sur­face and ground­wa­ter mainly with ni­trate.

Some of these basic re­com­men­ded ma­nure man­age­ment prac­tices in­clude roof­ing an­imal hous­ing, hav­ing a wa­ter-proof floor or cov­er­ing ma­nure dur­ing stor­age.

Without the prac­tices farm­ers risk caus­ing large nu­tri­ent losses dur­ing ma­nure stor­age, in­creas­ing green­house gas emis­sions, and re­du­cing the qual­ity of the ma­nure as a fer­til­izer.

RE­LATED ART­ICLE: For­ti­fied com­pos­ite ma­nure in­creases har­vest two-fold

In a sur­vey of ma­nure man­age­ment prac­tices on small, me­dium, and large scale farms in Ethiopia and Malawi in­dic­ated that farm­ers lack know­ledge on ma­nure man­age­ment.

However, farm­ers are able to ac­cess ag­ri­cul­tural ex­ten­sion ser­vices from both gov­ern­ment and non-gov­ern­ment agen­cies, al­though these ex­ten­sion ser­vices rarely in­cluded in­form­a­tion on im­proved ma­nure man­age­ment prac­tices.

Ma­nure con­tains im­port­ant plant nu­tri­ents such as ni­tro­gen (N), phos­phorus (P), po­tassium (K), and other sec­ond­ary nu­tri­ents and trace ele­ments that if well-man­aged it can be an asset, pro­mot­ing sus­tain­able ag­ri­cul­ture, and in­creas­ing crop pro­duc­tion and mar­ket­ab­il­ity of the pro­duce, par­tic­u­larly for small­holder farm­ers in sub-Saha­ran Africa (SSA).

RE­LATED ART­ICLE: Nyamira farmer look­ing for ma­nure sup­pli­ers in Kisii, Bomet, Kericho and Homa Bay

Ma­nure Col­lec­tion

Col­lect­ing a mix­ture of bed­ding ma­ter­ial, feed waste, flush­ing water, feath­ers, and soil among oth­ers to­gether with an­imal ex­creta af­fects the nu­tri­ent con­tent of the live­stock ma­nure.

This is be­cause bed­ding ma­ter­i­als such as straws usu­ally have lower N con­cen­tra­tion than the an­imal ex­creta.

RE­LATED ART­ICLE: Why the pro­posed an­imal ma­nure bill could hurt Kenya’s food pro­duc­tion goals

Ma­nure Treat­ment

Treat­ing or cur­ing ma­nure can be done in sev­eral ways such as dry­ing and com­post­ing. The lat­ter is ad­vant­age­ous to the ma­nure user be­cause it re­duces the bulk, however, it can res­ults into high losses of nu­tri­ents es­pe­cially ni­tro­gen hence in­dir­ect dry­ing in sun­light is re­com­men­ded.

Com­post­ing is an at­tract­ive op­tion for turn­ing on-farm or­ganic waste ma­ter­i­als into a valu­able farm re­source which is an ex­cel­lent soil im­prover and is cheaper than other soil amend­ments.

By provid­ing or­ganic mat­ter and soil nu­tri­ents, com­post im­proves the struc­ture of the soil, al­low­ing for bet­ter aer­a­tion, im­prov­ing drain­age, nu­tri­ent and water re­ten­tion, and re­duced risk of erosion.

RE­LATED ART­ICLE: Com­bin­ing ma­nure and fer­til­izer doubles crop yields

Ma­nure Stor­age

Stored ma­nure should be covered well to pre­serve the nu­tri­ents and help speed up de­com­pos­i­tion of the raw ma­nure.

Here a plastic film is re­com­men­ded. This is be­cause it can only let 20 per cent of ni­tro­gen out as com­pared to 55 per cent ni­tro­gen loss in ma­nure that is stored in open heaps.

An­other study in West­ern Kenya also has found that ma­nure stored in open pits had lower mass frac­tions of N and P than ma­nure in heaps under roof and in open heaps.

It is there­fore re­com­men­ded to shade ma­nure stor­age fa­cil­it­ies as much as pos­sible in order to re­duce ex­pos­ure to high tem­per­at­ures and sub­sequent N losses, as well as lim­it­ing ex­pos­ure to rain­fall, and thus min­im­iz­ing nu­tri­ent losses due to leach­ing

RE­LATED ART­ICLE: Farm using goat ma­nure as mulch and fer­til­iser doub­ling its pro­duc­tion

Ma­nure Ap­plic­a­tion

Most farm­ers in SSA apply ma­nure in ag­ri­cul­tural fields in holes, in fur­rows or spread/broad­cas­ted and in­cor­por­ated.

However, it is re­com­men­ded that the ma­nure be in­cor­por­ated into the soil im­me­di­ately after ap­plic­a­tion, as it will re­tain more nu­tri­ents (in par­tic­u­lar N) that will later be avail­able to crops.

For ex­ample, 90% of N from li­quid ma­nure will be avail­able to plants if it is in­cor­por­ated within 8 h com­pared to only 40% N avail­ab­il­ity if in­cor­por­a­tion is done after 5–7 days.


Share on social media

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Scroll to Top